ICONS Meets Marina Warner
Marina Warner is a prize-winning writer of fiction, criticism and history. Among her influential works are novels, short stories and children’s books, as well as studies of female myths, symbols, folklore and fairytale. ICONS spoke to her about Lewis Carroll and the 'Alice' books.
Lewis
Carroll was very famous for having an enormous number of “child
friends”, as he called them. He’s been criticised for that because
people suspected him of having the wrong kind of interests, but at the
time it was fairly well tolerated – there was no whisper of scandal
against him, and he took a lot of photographs of the children. He also
became very interested in children who were on the stage – he
campaigned for them to have better conditions and was worried that they
didn’t go to school. So he had a philanthropic interest in children as
well as his own child-like identification and deep sympathy with them.
But
the area in the books that shows he really understands children is his
complete interest in food: the jam tarts, the tea party, the treacle
wells, the honey. It just never stops all the way through! Then there
are the jokes, like the mock turtle soup, and the lobster quadrille. He
certainly had his eyes on the readers’ stomachs. He obviously enjoyed
food himself because he introduced tea into the common room of his
college at Oxford and organised the menus.
I noticed when I
was writing about him that there were just so many images of cakes and
puddings – he had a really sweet tooth. This lends itself to the comic
characters, even like Humpty Dumpty, who’s an egg, but he’s more like a
chocolate egg than an egg with a yolk. There’s a feeling all the time
of fun, tea party food.
How does Carroll bring Wonderland to life?
One
of the devices that Carroll uses is metamorphosis, or transformation –
part of the vocabulary of Wonderland. He uses it to wonderful effect.
Alice changes shape, but there are also all these talking creatures,
like the caterpillar smoking on his mushroom, Humpty Dumpty, and the
walrus and the carpenter. These are metamorphic creatures – they’re
halfway between animals and people. Each of them is vividly rendered so
you really have a sense of their character. You would have it even
without the illustrations but of course Tenniel’s illustrations were
very much directed by Carroll who drew the first drawings of Alice
himself and led Tenniel to create those characters in that
unforgettable way.
Do the surreal, dream-like parts of Alice have Freudian meanings?
There’s
an edition of the Alice books called The Annotated Alice by Martin
Gardner and it’s annotated in Freudian terms. It’s very convincing and
successful but I’m not such a thorough-going believer in psychoanalysis
that I think it’s the only meaning. For me, Freud is another way of
telling a story and you can certainly imagine that some of the ordeals
and encounters that Alice has have Freudian meanings. The descent into
the rabbit hole and her quite aggressive and hostile encounters with
adults have elements that you can certainly psychoanalyse. But I don’t
think it limits the meanings.
The symbols used have some
relationship to tradition but Carroll’s not a traditional symbolist at
all, which is one of the reasons why Alice In Wonderland is not really
a fairytale. There are no castles, or ogres, it’s not “once upon a time
long ago in a faraway land”. It’s now, in Alice’s house, and in her
garden, and it’s the result of a dream that takes place in the present
tense on the river in Oxford. We know where we are, we’re not in a
strange place. But that familiar place opens into the strange.
Although Alice’s Adventures In Wonderland is not a fairytale, has Carroll made Alice a typical fairytale heroine?
She’s
got elements of the quester figure, and some elements of the trickster
figure, if you’re being archetypal about it. She’s certainly a quester
because she goes through a series of ordeals and she returns, but she
returns with no treasure or a prince. It doesn’t conform to the
structural characteristics of fairytale, where you arrive at
recognition and have risen to high status, like with Dick Whittington,
or with Cinderella marrying a prince.
Alice is already fine,
she’s a wonderful, feisty, spirited little girl with a very clear mind
who sees through a lot of the nonsense and absurdity of what she
encounters. She doesn’t particularly change. She’s been through a lot
but she doesn’t actually arrive at a different place. She really just
gets back, possibly a little wiser about the outside world. Carroll is
on her side.
The whole thing is a bit of a parody of the pious
literature that was being written for children at the time because she
doesn’t learn through her ordeals to be a good and better person.
Carroll is not interested in that. He is interested in the mischief,
spirit and independence of mind of the children and he really puts that
forward in the books.
Why are stories important?
Because
they give us materials to think with. We need the characters and
emotions and states of mind that fiction gives us to negotiate our way
through our own lives. Alice In Wonderland is a very good example
because it gives us the wonderful protection of laughter – for example
at the end, when the trial takes place, and Alice says, “You’re nothing
but a pack of cards!” This dreadful kangaroo trial is going on like
many trials in countries that are tyranised and oppressed and there is
no rule of law. But Carroll makes fun of it. It’s satirical and light
and lively.
The other thing that one should never lose sight of
is that life is very boring or tedious and hard, and I’m a great
believer in escapism. You can feel well, and you can feel better if you
are entertained. Getting lost in a book or a story someone is telling
has the effect of distracting us from our little wrongs and our
difficulties.
What are your icons of England?
I teach at
the University of Essex, and I was very struck when I first started
driving there by the way the light clears over the estuary as you get
near. As you get out of London and near the east coast the light lifts
and you can really see how Constable and Gainsborough painted that
landscape. I have become very interested in that kind of painting of
landscape and how it shows the human hand at work on the lie of the
trees and fields. So I’d say that Constable’s painting of an elm tree
would be one of my icons.
But I’m very interested in people,
too. I’m interested in the traffic that came through those rivers.
People set out for the Americas for the first time from rivers like the
Blackwater Estuary. The East India Company adventurers set out
from there. So I think Tilbury Docks would be my icon. Tilbury Docks
under a wuthering sky. A grey, English sky, with light coming off the
water.